I read the posts of others and the topic seems to be interesting. In question it is clearly written without invoking any prior idea. Also @G_N pointed out the same,
So the question itself is abstract. Now the statement is “X made Y”.
- By virtue of the English language, “make” means the following,
So I can say X can create or can construct something that is Y.
About the argument who is greater: The creator (X) or the creation (Y)?
The answer is it depends and cannot be answered without having any prior knowledge about the entities. Even we can consider the case that, it is mother who brought up the son but it is the son who used to take care of the mother in her old age. So who is grater among X and Y is completely situation dependent.
So I can see a cyclic argument in the question, “Does everything require making or maker”?
If I say, X made Y; Y made Z and continues then someone will ask definitely, “Who made X?”
So, here I can invoke the concept of Mass and Energy transformation. If X is an object which was there at the first place and created all the things, then it was made by Energy. (Note: In this case I assumed some prior knowledge though)
Now, who made energy? So according to energy conservation law, energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only be transformed from one form to the other. Hence yeah here energy is that entity which exists without maker.
Its my understanding of the answers of questions asked by @karnamdpdurga. Every comment and suggestion regarding the same are always welcome to enrich the discussion.